| |
The Place which She occupies in her own household.
Takes the first decent husband who comes her way,
and afterward the "obey" of the marriage service is
dutifully regarded. This preferred to the dreaded
spinsterhood. Her frank anger at the American girl's
audacity, her sons and daughters worship her.
"You American girls are spoiled_utterly spoiled."
said an English matron. "You frequently reject a
young man for no other reason than that he is the
first who has done you the honor to offer you his
hand:" "But I don't care for him," said the one
addressed.
"There is no reason why you shouldn't care for him,
since he is eligible and with nothing about him to
which any reasonable creature can make objection.
But you Americans pick and choose and are entirely
too particular. The trouble is that you are sure if
you don't take one you can get another. The men make
fools of you. I assure you an English girl would be
ashamed of such flippant and capricious behavior."
The conversation is quoted to illustrate the subject
of this article, the status of Englishwomen in the
home. A study of English novels will reveal that the
roughness of the course of true love is almost
invariably occasioned by ineligibility, the suit of
a younger son, or the passion for the daughter of a
gardener or a gamekeeper. That a girl should reject
an offer merely because she did not care for the man
is incomprehensible to the majority of English maids
and matrons.
In spite of the fact that the reign of a Queen might
be supposed to restore the spirit of chivalry, an
Englishwoman is far from being queen of the
household in the sense that we should attach to the
title. She is, in fact, much nearer the rank of a
favorite slave.
From her earliest infancy she is imbued with the
idea of the superiority of her brothers. She is
taught that they are masters by right of birth. She
must wait upon them, be patient under their tyranny,
love them passionately, with a devotion and
self-sacrifice that asks for no return unless they
be graciously pleased to accord the same.It is
but fair to say, however, that, on the other hand,
the boys are taught that they are the natural
protectors of women. It is their duty to provide for
them, to decide for them in all the important
affairs of life, to shield them from dangers that an
American woman would thrust aside without thinking
of calling for assistance. No English girl is ever
considered capable of looking after herself.
The independence of the American girl is one of her
characteristics which exercises a fascination over
young Englishmen, for not all of them, be it said,
marry us for money.
There are many disinterested love matches arising
from the fact that an Englishman finds our American
girl companionable. In some cases, perhaps, his
courtship is actuated by feelings akin to his love
for the chase; for, whereas his own countrywomen
would receive him promptly and graciously, and
accept his attentions and offer as high honors, he
is not at all certain that his pursuit of a
dowerless American will end in her capture. In the
one case it is like hunting pheasants driven to
cover; in the other, following wild game in an open
prairie.
It is a fact that Englishwomen are very bitter in
their denunciation of our capture of their young
men, nobles and others. The columns of the London
papers were at one time open to a discussion of the
subject, and the brutal frankness of some male
correspondents in condemnation of English methods,
whereby English girls proved less attractive than
their American rivals in society, could not have
been pleasant reading to any but Americans.
The problem of the surplus female population in
England is a serious one, and the steady diminution
of marriage, in addition to the tendency of
Englishmen to seek wives among the daughters of the
Philistines, is a burden grievous to be borne by the
fathers and mothers of large families of girls.
With this prejudice on that side of the water is
a growing dislike on this side that the Briton
should carry off the number of Columbia's daughters
which he does an opposing condition which
accentuates the strength of the attraction between
the American girl and the Englishman.
It was proposed in a London women's periodical a few
years ago that an association should be formed to
induce widows to refrain from marrying a second time
as a matter of justice to their own sex.
It was broadly hinted that royalty had purposely set
an example. Reference was not made to the Queen,
except as an instance of undying loyalty to the
memory of her husband, but to the young Duchesse of
Albany, who might reasonably be expected to have
taken unto herself "another mate."
"The great dread of an English mother," says a
New-York woman who has lived years in England. "is
lest her daughter should acquire the unpardonable
reputation of being fast." Little girls are taught
to be shy and quiet."
"An unmarried woman unless she be of an age when she
is awarded the same license as the matron, which is
not before forty, can commit no greater solecism in
society than to engage in a natural vivacious
conversation with a young man, even in a drawing
room where numbers are present.
"Why, what harm could there be? You were all there
and could have heard every word that I said,"
protested a young American friend of mine who had
been reproved for such a misdemeanor.
"A young girl should never lead in a conversation.
She should be an attentive listener," was the
sententious reply of a typical English matron."
If such restraints are placed upon English girls
when in company it may readily be imagined to what
extent the system of chaperones is carried. "I never
spent half an hour in a room alone with Mr.___until
the night before we were married," said an
Englishwoman.
"How did he propose?" was the question that burst in
voluntarily from the listener's lips. " He asked my
brother for me," was the complacent answer.
Mr. Howells had not then written his near little
summary of this state of affairs, in which he says:
"In this country if a man loves a girl he tells her
so; in Europe, he goes and tells her grandmother."
But human nature cannot be suppressed, and English
lovers steal kisses and whisper sweet nothings in
dark corners in spite of sharp surveillance. Perhaps
the stolen sweets are all the sweeter, who knows!
An unprejudiced study of society in the two
countries leads to the belief that a combination of
the English and American plans would be ideal. The
English girl is subjected to too much espionage, the
American to too little.
It is not at all unusual in this country for a young
man to become an accepted suitor, and in some
instances, even a bridegroom, when he is a
comparative stranger to the father and mother,
sisters and brothers of his fiancé.
In England this could not happen. When an English
suitor calls, either before or after his
declaration, he is received by the family. After the
betrothal, which is considered a much more solemn
contract than in America, he is virtually one of the
family.
A word about the English estimate of an engagement
contract may not be out of place. In olden times the
"betrothal." which now forms part of the marriage
ritual, was a separate service, taking place months
or even a year before the marriage.
There is evidence of separate espousals having been
made in England as late as the time of Charles I.
The record of one such bears a date three years
previous to the marriage entry.
Although the formal religious recognition has long
since been forgotten, the spirit survives, and just
cause must be shown for breaking an engagement or
society looks askance, and is apt to invent reasons
at the expense of the woman.
Marriage, to a certain extent, is freedom to the
English girl. That is, an English matron may talk to
whom she pleases, go where she pleases, do as she
pleases within certain limits, which would not be
considered limited even by Americans.
But such freedom is only when she is abroad. In
her home she is more than ever bound to subject
herself unto the higher powers.
"I have been married forty years, and never crossed
father in my life," said a dear old lady whose
conception of wifely duty had been so faithfully
carried out that, though one might differ with, one
could but respect her.
"I am his wife, therefore I must be subject to him
in all things," writes a young matron in a sorrowful
burst of confidence.
"So this is Jack's chair." said an old gentleman to
his American daughter-in-law who had drawn an easy
chair in front of the open fire for his benefit.
"And I suppose he comes home and sits down here, and
you take off his boots and fetch him his slippers,
and",
"No, father," was the reply. "That is Jack's chair
and he sits in it, but he takes off his own boots,
and the children bring him his slippers."
The old gentleman stared and probably thanked the
goodness and the grace (according to the little hymn
which all English children learn) that had saved him
from taking unto himself an American wife.
"I am inclined to doubt the happiness to be found in
international marriages," says a close observer;
that is to say where an Englishman marries an
American girl. "He expects a subservience and an
amount of personal attention which American women
are accustomed to receive, not to give. On the other
hand, I have reason to believe that were American
men to marry English women, the result would be most
fortunate, for each would be flattered by a
deference and service never anticipated."
There is one more relation of life which needs to be
noted, and in this Americans may envy their sisters
"over the sea." The devotion of children, especially
of sons to their mothers, is one of the most
charming phases of English home life.
"The mater" is a goddess to her boys. From his
earliest years he is taught by his father to yield
implicit and instant obedience.
As soon as he can reach the door handle he must run
to open the door for her when she enters or leaves a
room. He must provide her with the most comfortable
chair, he must fetch and carry for her, look after
her comfort, and anticipate her every wish.
A hint of the service an English son renders to his
mother may be had from the printed accounts of the
conduct of the Prince of Wales when, on state
occasions, he appears with the Queen. It might be
supposed to be more Court etiquette, but it is, in
fact, the deference of an English gentlemen to his
mother.
|
|