|
The highest lady in the realm,
Queen Victoria, is always addressed
by the ladies and gentlemen of her
household, and by all members of the
aristocracy and gentry, as "Ma'am,"
not "Madam," or "Your Majesty," but
simply, "Yes, ma'am," "No, ma'am."
All classes not coming within the
category of gentry, such as the
lower professional classes, the
middle classes, the lower middle
classes, the lower classes
(servants), would address her as
"Your Majesty," and not as "Ma'am."
The Prince of Wales is addressed as
"Sir" by the aristocracy and gentry,
and never as "Your Royal Highness"
by either of these classes, but by
all other people he is addressed as
"Your Royal Highness."
The other sons of Queen Victoria
are addressed as "Sir" by the upper
classes, but as "Your Royal
Highness" by the middle and lower
classes, and by all persons not
coming within the category of
gentry; and by gentry, English
people mean not only the landed
gentry, but all persons belonging to
the army and navy, the clergy, the
bar, the medical and other
professions, the aristocracy of art
(Sir Frederick Leighton, the
President of the Royal Academy, can
always claim a private audience with
the sovereign), the aristocracy of
wealth, merchant princes, and the
leading City merchants and bankers.
The Princess of Wales and all the
princesses of the blood royal are
addressed as "Ma'am" by the
aristocracy and gentry, but as "Your
Royal Highness" by all other
classes.
A foreign prince is addressed as
"Prince" and "Sir" by the
aristocracy and gentry, and as "Your
Serene Highness" by all other
classes; and a foreign princess
would be addressed as "Princess" by
the aristocracy, or "Your Serene
Highness" by the lower grades, but
never as "Ma'am."
An English duke is addressed as
"Duke" by the aristocracy and
gentry, and never as "Your Grace" by
the members of either of these
classes; but all other classes
address him as "Your Grace." A
marquis is sometimes
conversationally addressed by the
upper classes as "Markis," but
generally as "Lord A--," and a
marchioness as "Lady B--;" all other
classes would address them as
"Marquis" or "Marchioness." The same
remark holds good as to earls,
countesses, barons, baronesses--all
are "Lord B--" or "Lady B--."
But Americans, who are always,
if presented at court, entitled to
be considered as aristocracy and
gentry, and as such are always
received, must observe that English
people do not use titles often even
in speaking to a duke. It is only an
ignorant person who garnishes his
conversation with these titles. Let
the conversation with Lord B flow on
without saying "My lord" or "Lord
B--" more frequently than is
absolutely necessary. One very
ignorant American in London was
laughed at for saying, "That isn't
so, lord," to a nobleman. He should
have said, "That isn't so, I think,"
or, "That isn't so, Lord B--," or
"my lord."
The daughters of dukes,
marquises, and earls are addressed
as "Lady Mary," "Lady Gwendoline,"
etc. This must never be forgotten,
and the younger sons of dukes and
marquises are called "Lord John
B--," "Lord Randolph Churchill,"
etc. The wife of the younger son
should always be addressed by both
the Christian and surname of her
husband by those slightly acquainted
with her, and by her husband's
Christian name only by her intimate
friends. Thus those who know Lady
Randolph Churchill well address her
as "Lady Randolph." The younger sons
of earls, viscounts, and barons bear
the courtesy title of "Honorable,"
as do the female members of the
family; but this is never used
colloquially under any
circumstances, although always in
addressing a letter to them.
Baronets are addressed by their
full title and surname, as "Sir
Stafford Northcote," etc., by
persons of the upper classes, and by
their titles and Christian names by
all lower classes. Baronets' wives
are addressed as "Lady B--"or "Lady
C--." They should not be addressed
as "Lady Thomas B--'" that would be
to give them the rank of the wife of
a younger son of a duke or marquis,
instead of that of a baronet's wife
only.
In addressing foreigners of rank
colloquially the received rule is to
address them by their individual
titles without the addition of the
surname to their titles. In case of
a prince being a younger son he is
addressed as "Prince Henry," as in
the case of Prince Henry of
Battenberg. The sons of the reigning
monarchs are addressed as "Your
Imperial Highness." A foreign
nobleman is addressed as "Monsieur
le Duc," "Monsieur le Comte,"
"Monsieur le Baron," etc.; but if
there is no prefix of "de," the
individual is addressed as "Baron
Rothschild," "Count Hohenthal," etc.
While it is proper on the
Continent to address an unmarried
woman as mademoiselle, without the
surname, in England it would be
considered very vulgar. "Miss" must
be followed by the surname. The
wives of archbishops, bishops, and
deans are simply Mrs. A--, Mrs. B--,
etc., while the archbishop and
bishop are always addressed as "Your
Grace" and as "My lord," their wives
deriving no precedence and no title
from their husbands' ecclesiastical
rank. It is the same with military
personages.
Peeresses invariably address their
husbands by their title; thus the
Duchess of Sutherland calls her
husband "Sutherland," etc. Baronets'
wives call their husbands "Sir John"
or "Sir George," etc.
The order of precedence in
England is strictly adhered to, and
English matrons declare that it is
the greatest convenience, as it
saves them all the trouble of
choosing who shall go in first, etc.
For this reason, among others, the
"Book of the Peerage" has been
called the Englishman's Bible, it is
so often consulted.
But the question of how to treat
English people has many another
phase than that of mere title, as we
look at it from an American point of
view.
When we visit England we take
rank with the highest, and can well
afford to address the queen as
"Ma'am." In fact, we are expected to
do so. A well-bred, well-educated,
well-introduced American has the
highest position in the social
scale. He may not go in to dinner
with a duchess, but he is generally
very well placed. As for a well-
bred, handsome woman, there is no
end to the privileges of her
position in England, if she observes
two or three rules. She should not
effuse too much, nor be too generous
of titles, nor should she fail of
the necessary courtesy due always
from guest to hostess. She should
have herself presented at court by
her Minister or by some
distinguished friend, if She wishes
to enter fashionable society. Then
she has the privilege of attending
any subsequent Drawing-room, and is
eligible to invitations to the court
bails and royal concerts, etc.
American women have succeeded
wonderfully of late years in all
foreign society from their beauty,
their wit, and their originality.
From the somewhat perilous
admiration of the Prince of Wales
and other Royal Highnesses for
American beauties, there has grown
up, however, a rather presumptuous
boldness in some women, which has
rather speedily brought them into
trouble, and therefore it may be
advisable that even a witty and very
pretty woman should hold herself in
check in England.
English people are very kind in
illness, grief, or in anything which
is inevitable, but they are speedily
chilled by any step towards a too
sudden intimacy. They resent
anything like "pushing" more than
any other people in the world. In no
country has intellect, reading,
cultivation, and knowledge such
"success" as in England. If a lady,
especially, can talk well, she is
invited everywhere. If she can do
anything to amuse the company--as to
sing well, tell fortunes by the
hand, recite, or play in charades or
private theatricals--she is almost
sure of the highest social
recognition. She is expected to
dress well, and Americans are sure
to do this. The excess of dressing
too much is to be discouraged. It is
far better to be too plain than too
fine in England, as, indeed, it is
everywhere; an overdressed woman is
undeniably vulgar in any country.
If we could learn to treat
English people as they treat us in
the matter of introductions, it
would be a great advance. The
English regard a letter of
introduction as a sacred institution
and an obligation which cannot be
disregarded. If a lady takes a
letter to Sir John Bowring, and he
has illness in his family and cannot
ask her to dinner, he comes to call
on her, he sends her tickets for
every sort of flower show, the
museums, the Botanical Garden, and
all the fine things; he sends her
his carriage--he evidently has her
on his mind. Sir Frederick Leighton,
the most courted, the busiest man in
London, is really so kind, so
attentive, so assiduous in his
response to letters of introduction
that one hesitates to present a
letter for fear of intruding on his
industrious and valuable life.
Of course there are disagreeable
English people, and there is an
animal known as the English snob,
than which there is no Tasmanian
devil more disagreeable. Travelers
everywhere have met this variety,
and one would think that formerly it
must have been more common than it
is now. There are also English
families who have a Continental, one
might say a cosmopolitan, reputation
for disagreeability, as we have some
American families, well known to
history, who have an almost
patrician and hereditary claim to
the worst manners in the universe.
Well-born bears are known all over
the world, but they are in the
minority. It is almost a sure sign
of base and ignoble blood to be
badly mannered. And if the American
visitor treats his English host half
as well as the host treats him, he
may feel assured that the entente
cordiale will soon be perfect.
One need not treat the average
Englishman either with a too
effusive cordiality or with that
half-contemptuous fear of being
snubbed which is of all things the
most disagreeable. A sort of "chip
on the shoulder" spread-eagleism
formerly made a class of Americans
unpopular; now Americans are in
favor in England, and are treated
most cordially.
|