|
It was in midsummer of 1816 that a
young and, if her middle age told
truly of her youth, a beautiful
English woman opened a little school
in what was then the upper part of
the city of New York. Some twenty
years before, there had come to seek
their fortune in the growing town on
Manhattan Island, a sturdy Kentish
family named Boorman.
Active citizens of their new home
they proved, and two of the
children, Esther and James, we know
had more than common weight and
influence. Early in life Esther
Boorman Smith found herself with two
little daughters to support, and
with few enough occupations to
choose from. Not even women teachers
were needed as they are today, for
the public free school was still an
experiment and but two existed in
the city. Small private schools
there were a-plenty, for the most
part short-lived ventures, and
though often carried on by women,
most of the instructors were men.
Indeed, in this very year was
opened a most promising school under
the patronage of Drs. Gardiner
Spring and J.B. Romeyne and George
Griffin, Esq., two of the most
influential clergymen and one of the
most noted lawyers of the time.
However, 1816 was a good year in the
new land, and so there appeared in
the "Evening Post" for July 11 the
following advertisement: "Mrs. E.
Smith's establishment for the board
and tuition of young ladies, No. 3
Hudson Square, is now in readiness
for the reception of pupils as
boarders or day boarders. The
different branches of education by
the most approved masters. Further
information may be had on
application to Mrs. S., and those to
whom she is unknown are respectfully
referred to the following gentlemen:
the Rev. Dr. Mason, Samuel Boyd,
Esq., D. J.H. Rogers, and Peter
Radcliff, Esq."
Esther Smith is described in later
years as not only a very beautiful
woman, but of great charm of manner,
of marvelous patience, and without
thought of self. A lovable
personality this, which well
explains the devotion she won from
her own family. But she must have
had as well, in those early days,
qualities that made for business
success. Backed and encouraged as
she always was by her brother, James
Boorman, she had evidently her share
of the canny foresight and
determination that soon made this
young man one of the powerful
merchants of the town. One recognize
his unerring and daring real estate
sense in the location of the little
school near the new church. St.
John-in-the-fields, as it was
fittingly named. It is described as
a "missionary enterprise, the church
set on the outskirts of civilization
opposite a dreary marsh, covered
with brambles and bulrushes and
tenanted with frogs and
water-snakes." The tract was part of
the Anneke Jans farm, and whether a
missionary enterprise or not, Mrs.
Smith was quite right in believing
that Trinity Corporation knew, as
usual what it was doing with its
property.
Nevertheless, by the early
twenties this had become one of the
most select and delightful regions
of the town. The stately church
looked down on stately homes, and
the marsh and the frogs were of the
past. General Schuyler, John
Ericsson, Dr. Mason, and the family
of Alexander Hamilton, were among
those who dwelt in the broad Flemish
brick houses with their brown stone
porticos and fine iron railings and
wrens, bluebirds and orioles, built
undisturbed, and where old Cisco the
negro gardener puttered peacefully
among his trees and flowers.
Although the first month brought but
one pupil, gradually came more, and
it is curious to note, by means of
the advertising columns, the rise
and disappearance of school after
school, while that of "Mrs. E.
Smith" persists, seemingly with so
few vicissitudes that not only does
she never deign in her notices to
explain what is taught or how, or at
what prices, but she now and then
serenely omits the address, sure
that every one knows where to find
her "establishment for young
ladies." One almost wishes she had
been a little less successful, or a
little less dignified, whichever it
were.
We could have gleaned much
knowledge had she been as
communicative as Miss Eliza
Woffendale, who for years announced
her "pleasure in instructing young
lady boarders" at forty dollars per
quarter; or as Miss Oran, of whose
writing master, Mr. Dolbeare, "a
beautiful hand may be acquired in
one quarter"; or as those trustees
of the Female High School, that
capstone of feminine education, who
offered "English, French,
composition, rhetoric, penmanship,
arithmetic, algebra, and the other
branches of mathematics bookkeeping
if required, ancient and modern
history, natural, experimental and
moral philosophy, plain, fine, and
ornamental needlework," at six
dollars a quarter without French,
and fourteen with.
Despite the reserve of the Smith
advertisements, from these
contemporary schools and from our
knowledge of the city of those days
one may guess a little of the life
at 3 Hudson Square. Vauxhall, a
small edition of the London
playground, was near by. Castle
Garden, than a similar amusement
place, and Poole's Museum were in
their heyday. The shops advertised
bombazine, juniper berries, and
commodities of which we now know
hardly the names and must guess the
use. The bookstores provided for the
schools red and black ink powder and
sand and quills, Peter Parley's
Arithmetic, Uncle Jacob Abbott's
Lessons, Goodrich's History, and
Morse's Geography, and announced the
arrival from the other side of Jane
Porter's newest novel and the
opening chapters of "Quentin Durward."
Probably some of Mrs. Smith's
boarding pupils came from New
Jersey; for, even after the opening
of Fulton's first ferry, in 1822,
young ladies did not cross the
Hudson daily. We know that some came
from up the State, for these had to
go home before the river closed in
the early winter, returning when the
ice broke in the spring. Apparently
there was a short vacation in April
and one in August, schools
announcing their opening in May and
in September. In the earliest years
of the school, before the park was
in order, there was skating in
Hudson Square, and so near was it to
the country that a customary spring
treat was a trip to a farm at
Broadway and Fourth Street to gather
strawberries.
September fifth, 1822, the "Post"
has this announcement: "Mrs. Smith's
boarding school will be opened on
Wednesday, the 18th instant, at the
house on the Eighth Avenue, formerly
occupied by Mrs. Brute, about a half
mile above Love Lane, between the
dwellings of Richard Harris, Esq.,
and the Messrs. Moses. Should the
parents of any of her day scholars
be desirous of a temporary residence
for them that they may enter
immediately on their studies, Mrs.
Smith will be able to receive a few.
Letters addressed to Mrs. Smith
through the Post Office will be
attended to."
Love Lane was well out in the
country by Chelsea Village, running
into Eighth Avenue from the
Bloomingdale Road, near what is now
Twenty-first Street. So this new
house was in the Thirties, then open
country, with fields sloping down to
the river. Probably this move was on
account of the yellow fever
epidemic, so severe that season as
to force the shutting off of a
portion of the city to the south of
Hudson Square.
In 1834 Mrs. Smith reopened her
school "at the corner of Beach and
Varick Streets, say 23 Varick
Street." This odd indecision as to
the number was settled before the
year's directory was published, for
in that Mrs. Smith appears with
twenty other of the "principal
female seminaries of the city." Only
one of these was as far uptown as
St. Mark's Place. James Boorman had
by this time become one of the
notable men of the city. He had been
active in founding the University of
the City of New York and he was now
interested in the improvement of the
region where the new college was
building at Seventh Street.
The ancient Potter's Field and
gallows ground had been turned into
Washington Square and a number of
wealthy men were building homes
about its freshly laid out lawns and
walks. Mr. Boorman built the fine
old house of light red brick with
white trimming, still standing at
the eastern corner of Fifth Avenue
and the Square, and above two more
houses, 1 and 3 Fifth Avenue for his
sister's school. In September, 1835,
the school opened in this new home,
and it was in this year also that
there came a piece of rare good
fortune not only to Mrs. Smith, to
whom it meant years of warm
friendship, but to thousands of
young women who, in the next thirty
years, were to come under the new
teacher's strong and wise influence.
Lucy Green had been a pupil in the
school and before that had studied
under Lucretia Bancroft, sister of
the historian, and Dorothea L. Dihat
pioneer of prison reform, and she
shared their qualities of
earnestness and high principle. She
had, too, the advantage, at that
time uncommon for women, of a season
of foreign travel.
Cholera had visited the city
severely in 1834, and this may have
been the "severe contagious illness"
which we are told had for a time a
serious effect on the prosperity of
the school. Certainly the strictest
economy was at this time needful
before the continued success of the
enterprise that had served the city
for twenty years was assured. What
is doubtless Mrs. Smith's last
advertisement appeared in March,
1838. The change of the school year
points to the change in town life,
in which the summer had become
definitely holiday time. It reads:
"Mrs. E. Smith, formerly of Hudson
Square, deems it essential to
announce that she is about to
relinquish her school as reported,
but that it will be continued under
her personal superintendence for a
limited number of pupils.
Mrs. Smith has adopted the system of
three terms in the year of full
three months each, the vacation
being from the first of July to the
twentieth of September." The
following season the notice is from
the Misses Lucy M. and Mary R.
Green, who, "having taken the
establishment for many years
conducted by Mrs. E. Smith, first in
Hudson Square and since in its
present location, will recommence
the school at the close of the
vacation on Tuesday, Sept. 10th.
Miss Lucy M. Green has held
responsible situations with Mrs.
Smith during the last four years,
and it will be the care of the
Misses Green substantially to
preserve the regulations and course
of instruction heretofore observed."
Though there be no one left now to
tell us of personal knowledge what
manner of teacher was the head
mistress who ruled the school
through its first quarter century,
it needs not the statement in
William Allen Butler's sketch of
Miss Green to assure us that "it
numbered among its pupils the
daughters of many of the leading men
of the city and elsewhere, who
valued the moral and religious tone
which characterized the life and
activities of the school, as well as
the thorough instruction which it
imparted."
The foundation was ready for the new
builder, and she was eminently
fitted to her task. The sister, Mary
Green, had charge of the younger
children, but it is Miss Lucy who
lives so vividly in the memory of
all who knew her. Strict and severe
she was, absolutely just, and with a
fund of tenderness hidden beneath
her outward manner and a sunny smile
that her pupils never forgot.
Shallowness and vanity were to her
the unforgivable sins, and plain
clothing, no jewelry, and simple
pleasures figured large in her
creed. Quakerlike in dress, wearing
always cloth gowns of ankle length,
and heelless shoes, her only
ornament her beautiful hair, she was
a noticeable and impressive figure
in those decades of hoop-skirts and
furbelows.
Again there had been no mistake in
the choice of location. Washington
Square and lower Fifth Avenue
became, James Boorman and his
confreres intended they should, the
most notable residential section of
the town, and the school, in its
broad, generous, dignified brick
building (for No. 3 was given up and
No. 1 enlarged), was for the next
thirty years perhaps easily the
leading school for girls in the
city. It was not so made, however,
by any deference to fashion or
luxury. Indeed, a simplicity that
may bespeak still scant means is in
that early requirement that at the
call to dinner each young lady
should carry her chair from the
school to the dining-room, and carry
it, moreover, "quietly and in a
genteel manner," and in those
wash-rooms furnished with long
wooden sinks, white crockery bowls,
and large tin dippers.
To quote again from Mr. Butler, "It
was wholly foreign to the purpose of
Miss Green to give the character or
repute of a fashionable school to
the institution...Her aim was rather
to mould and train the minds that
came under her care by developing
the highest sense of duty in the
exercise of every faculty...She
impressed her own personality upon
the scholars, particularly in the
direction of the education of the
conscience and the strengthening of
principle." Rigid though her
requirements were, in fact, because
of their unyielding independence and
high idealism, the repute of the
school grew, and for years boarders
and day pupils numbered between two
and three hundred.
With the highest ideals of the
position and the power of woman in
the home, Miss Green sought to train
for the home, and she trained well
and wisely in her generation:
indeed, in some ways beyond her
generation. Text-book and lecturer
did not satisfy her. Her girls were
expected to look further and were
familiar figures at the New York
Society Library, then around the
block in University Place, and the
Astor Library in Lafayette Place.
French, German, Italian, Latin, were
taught, and if Greek were omitted,
the reading of the Iliad in English
was a part of the course in
literature. How little she inclined
toward easy lessons may be gathered
by this extract from the journal of
her brother, Andrew H. Green, whose
advice and aid counted for much in
the school and who was in 1844
teaching a class in American
History. He had been planning, he
writes, a set of lectures "on the
constitution and jurisprudence of
our country, making them rather
general and simple. To do this
philosophically I shall have to
commence about the beginning of the
fourteenth century and take a review
of all the nations of Europe at this
date, gradually bringing the
features in each which bear on the
formation of society in this country
together till I come to the
Declaration of Independence. Then
the course will be clear." A large
proposition this, and one does not
wonder that he seems doubtful of
accomplishing it.
Herself an excellent teacher, Miss
Green knew how to choose her
helpers. Many came from the Union
Theological Seminary, thus keeping
the tradition of the school that had
always been affiliated with the
Presbyterian and Dutch elements in
the city. Among the men and women
noted in their day, or whose names
are still familiar, are those of Dr.
George B. Cheever, eloquent preacher
of the Church of the Puritans and
doughty temperance fighter; Henry J.
Raymond, founder of the "Times";
Annie Botta, leader of perhaps the
only salon New York ever possessed;
Felix Foresti, professor at both the
University and Columbia; Clarence
Cook; Lyman Abbott; and Elihu Root,
then a young man fresh from college,
whose classes had to be duly
chaperoned.
In 1867 came a new teacher, a tall
young lady, dark-haired and
keen-eyed. Reared among the Orange
County hills, she had been educated
at the historic Montgomery Academy,
which, still doing this country good
service, was already a quarter
century old when 3 Hudson Square
welcomed its lone scholar. The
Academy had sent generations of
students out into the world before
one class gave two remarkable
educators to this city, Frances E.
Graham, and her youthful rival in
mathematics, the beloved Dean Van
Amringe of Columbia. Miss Green, in
the height of her success, after
thirty busy and honored years was
ready to retire to the quiet country
home in Massachusetts. After
watching her new helper two years
she made up her mind that here she
had found one of the force and the
will to carry on her work. The
proposition was made to the young
teacher, to whom, to quote from Miss
Margaret M. Graham, "this honor was
so unexpected that she at first
declined, but after much thought and
persuasion consented and with her
sisters endeavored carefully to
carry out the ideas of her
predecessors."
There must have been a kinship in
character between these two, both
gentlewomen of the old school, for
the words in which they are
described by their pupils today are
curiously alike. Miss Graham, too,
was severe, strict, but absolutely
just, of stern principle, of high
ideals, while beneath a precise
manner lay a warm sympathy and
understanding. But the likeness did
not extend to appearance. The new
head mistress was tall, slender,
stately, and though one can hardly
imagine her in hoops or frills, her
black silk gown, the rustle of which
was a warning to every lazy girl
within hearing, belonged to her type
quite as did Miss Lucy's short cloth
frock to hers.
Various staid customs that long
persisted under the Misses Graham,
must, one fancies, have come down
from the old regime. That clearing
of the Sunday supper table, when the
dishes were passed from hand to hand
till gathered in assorted piles at
the lower end of the long line,
surely came from a simpler day.
Improving topics were introduced
from time to time at meals, and
there has been preserved a classic
reply from one gentle and diffident
maiden to the question, "What would
you do were you thrown on your own
resources tomorrow?" "I think I
should go and live with Uncle John"
was her happy solution. If these
pupils were from the "first
families," this did not relieve the
teachers of care of more than minds
and morals, and the youngsters of
the primary department were met at
the door by a kindly guardian whom
they greeted with an "obligatory
grin" and turned up nails, before
the password, "J'ai dix,"
Mademoiselle," which meant that they
were on time and in order, let them
enter. The morning greeting, in
which the pupils, rising at their
desks, repeated in unison, "Good
morning, Miss Graham," and then
answered to the roll-call by a
memorized verse of the Bible, was an
ancient function.
But the Sunday of the boarding
pupils, the "young ladies of the
family," as they were always called,
was the most characteristic feature
of the Green and Graham training.
The day began with morning prayers
at half-past seven, the pupils
reading in turn, generally more than
once, singing and prayer closing the
exercises. After breakfast at eight
the pupils attended to their rooms
as usual, then came down for the
Bible class, which lasted till the
first church bell. All walked in
procession to the First Presbyterian
Church, save the few who stopped on
the way at the Church of the
Ascension. The few moments between
service and dinner were to be
employed in the learning of hymns.
At the close of dinner each young
woman was expected to give "a
thought from the sermon," altogether
the most dreaded item in the day's
program, calling as it did for a
quotation from a sermon that one's
teacher also had heard. There
followed a brief interval into which
could be tucked another verse of
one's hymn! The afternoon Bible
class closed with the first bell for
afternoon service, and on returning
from church, if one were wise, one
studied one's hymn till evening
prayers, which preceded the
half-past six supper. After supper,
with chairs pushed back from the
table, each girl recited the hymn
that had safely occupied all the
leisure moments of the day. "When
this was over," comments an old
student, "great peace reigned in our
hearts, for with the exception of
hymn singing in the ladies' parlor
till early bedtime the program for
the day was ended."
One would like to know if the school
text with which each newcomer in the
Green and the Graham schools had to
answer to her name, were learned
also in Hudson Square. One somehow
fancies that a very weary teacher
chose it with a grim enjoyment of
the second clause. "But as touching
brotherly love ye need not that I
write unto you, for ye yourselves
are taught of God to love one
another. Study to be quiet and to do
your own business and to work with
your own hands as we have commanded
you, that ye may walk honestly
toward them that are without, and
that ye may have lack of nothing."
That of which custom was but the
index, the spirit and aim of the old
school, continued unchanged; and
this it was that held so many of the
old patrons and brought to the
Misses Graham children and
grandchildren of the Green and the
Smith connections. To Miss Graham as
to Miss Green, religion was the
main-spring of conduct and the Bible
the absolute guide of daily life.
Though the boarders had naturally
more Bible training than the day
scholars, no one was long under the
Graham influence without feeling the
religious element that entered every
department of the school life. A
professor who had known Miss Graham
well, when asked for some analysis
of her as an educator, answered
instantly, "She was a character
builder," and in these words he
precisely described her power.
Scholarship, attainment, these were
good, but of value only as the
result of honest work and as used
for high purpose.
No more than their predecessors did
the Misses Graham bid for notice by
advertising success or numbers, or
yielding their views of sound
training. Indeed, the advertising
sense of both these principals was
so ill developed that the daily
walks of the "young ladies of the
family" were taken in two divisions
lest the whole number in line,
swinging briskly along the Avenue,
should attract too much attention.
The naive criticism of one
disappointed pupil describes the
attitude of the school. "There's no
style here," complained the
dissatisfied damsel. "The main
things thought of are study and
courteous behavior."
But if the aims of the teachers were
the same, the city had altered
almost beyond recognition. When in
1881 the move was made to No. 63,
the stately house at Avenue, the
lower avenue had passed its prime,
and no longer could any one region
boast the position it had held.
Neither were schools of advanced
standing any longer rare, and
methods were changing. The
preparatory school was taking the
place of the school of general
training, for the woman's college
had come. With it came better
trained women teachers and the
invasion of women into the field of
men was being gently and surely
accomplished in the private schools
long before the portentous phrase
had terrified the timid. Fortunately
the invasion was not entirely
complete, and there were still
lecturers from outside.
There was Professor Braman, so
gentle, so frail, seemingly so old,
that from his looks one fancied he
might have taught "natural and
experimental philosophy" in the
schoolroom at Hudson Square. There
was still Clarence Cook, most
inspiring, most unsystematic of
lecturers, who managed to fit
several hours with da Vinci's
sketchbooks into his course in
English literature. Professor Fiske
delivered some of his finest
lectures from a tiny platform, quite
too small for his portly person; and
among the later men were Professor
Means, Professor Fairchild, Dr.
Leighton Williams, and Dr. John D.
Quackenbos. But Mr. Tavenor, who
taught Miss Green's young ladies to
read with expression, and the
sarcastic Mr. Wilder, who frightened
the timid out of what expression
they might naturally have had, and
was rewarded by enthusiastic
admiration, had long given place to
their successors.
Mr. Jackson, who taught a fine,
legible Italian hand, as many of his
old pupils can testify today, had
vanished, and Mr. Dolmage, too, had
retired from the arduous business of
watching his pupils imitate his
neatly written copies. The "English
angular" and Mrs. Skinner for a time
reigned in their stead, and helped
to break the precedent that had come
down from the beginning of the
century, when, to judge by the
advertisements, penmanship was
entirely a masculine art. Madame
Lancon held Monsieur Aspin's desk,
and never French master inspired
more awe than did that stern
Huguenot lady. French was a
specialty under both Miss Green and
Miss Graham. It was the rule that
all conversation between pupils
during the school hours must be in
French, and one must one's self
report failure to obey, a regulation
that caused those of tender
conscience anxious searchings of
memory before the roll-call.
Mademoiselle Giobe in early days,
and later the genial Madame English
and then Madame Wainwright, the
friend of the later generation of
students, presided at the daily
afternoon conversation hours, from
four to five and five to six, when
the girls brought their mending and
had their stitches supervised along
with their accent and their grammar.
The city did not stop changing in
1881. It went on faster and faster.
In 1893 the new house at
Seventy-second Street and Broadway
seemed a permanent location, but in
fourteen years business had crept
close, making it untenable, and the
move was made to the present
beautiful home at 42 Riverside
Drive. It was in 1910, after forty
years of devoted labor, that the
Misses Graham retired, giving up the
school to Mr. and Mrs. Miner. Mrs.
Miner, as Miss White, had been a
successful teacher in the school
some years before, so that for the
third time it was handed on to one
who knew and respected its
traditions and its aims.
|