State of California
The discovery of gold at
Sutter's Mill, near Coloma, on
January 24, 1848, gave an
impetus to immigration from all
parts of the globe. The great
body of gold-seekers, "the
Argonauts," arrived in 1849, and
by the end of the year the
population exceeded 100,000.
Nearly all the newcomers were
unmarried men, in haste to get
rich. Since the Civil War
California has experienced a
magnificent economic
development. The completion of
the Union Pacific Railroad
furthered the prosperity of the
State. Both from the Eastern
States and from across the
Pacific the tide of immigration
flowed in steadily.
So considerable, indeed, did the
number of Chinese immigrants
become that between 1870 and
1890 the Chinese question
dominated State politics and
influenced national legislation.
In the mining districts the
Chinese occupied claims which
had been abandoned as exhausted
by their original proprietors,
or acted as cooks and menial
servants. In the towns they
performed various duties. Their
stolid patience and their
capacity for long and sustained
work made them in one way ideal
laborers for the development of
a new country; but their extreme
frugality and their willingness
to work for a small wage made
them formidable competitors of
white labor.
This subject
first assumed importance in the
United States about the year
1870, although legislation
hostile to the Chinese began in
California in 1855. The
California Legislature
investigated the subject in 1862
and the United States Congress
sent a joint special committee
to the Pacific Coast in 1876,
the Voluminous report of which
gives the most authentic
information on the subject yet
published. (Rep. 44th Cong. 2d
Sess. Sen. R. 689, pp. 1281,
Wash. 1877).
Up to 1868 the United States was
trying to compel China to admit
Americans into that country for
the pursuit of trade and
commerce. The first treaty
(1844) with China gave Americans
the right of residence in five
ports and gave them the rights
of extra-territorial consular
jurisdiction. The Americans,
though not participating in the
Chinese war of 1858, secured all
of the privileges obtained by
other nations, which were
stipulated in the Reed Treaty of
1858. Nothing was said in these
treaties about Chinese in
America, who came here under the
same conditions as the citizens
of other nations. The Burlingame
Treaty of 1868 deprecated
involuntary immigration---aimed
at coolie labor---but declared
the right of migration to be an
inherent one, and a special
resolution of Congress (July 27,
1868) declared the right of
expatriation to be a natural and
inherent right of all people,
the obstruction or restriction
of which is inconsistent with
the fundamental principles of
the republic.
This declaration became
subsequently an object of
embarrassment in dealing with
the Chinese when anti-Chinese
feeling on the Pacific Coast
made it necessary for both
political parties in 1876 to
insert anti-Chinese planks in
their platforms. The question of
abrogating the treaty of 1868
was discussed in Congress. A
bill to restrict Chinese
immigration passed both Houses
of Congress in 1879, but was
vetoed by President Hayes
because it violated the Treaty
of 1868. A commission was sent
to China in 1880 to negotiate a
new treaty to permit the
absolute prohibition of Chinese
immigration. The Treaty of 1880
declared that "the Government of
the United States may regulate,
limit, or suspend such coming or
residence, but may not
absolutely prohibit it." The
treaty further stated that the
limitation must be reasonable
and apply only to Chinese
laborers.
The act of 1882 suspended the
immigration of Chinese laborers
for ten years and gave those in
the United States or those who
should arrive within 90 days
after the passage of the act the
right to remain, but forbade the
naturalization of Chinese, and
the act applied to both skilled
and unskilled laborers. The act
was amended in 1888, while a
treaty, in which the Chinese
Government undertook to prohibit
Chinese laborers from coming to
the United States, and our
Government agreed to protect
those here from the violence and
outrages to which they were
constantly subjected without
redress was still pending. The
amendment prohibited the return
on certificate of Chinamen once
here who went back to China,
declared all such certificates
void, and practically made
Chinese exclusion permanent.
This act angered the Chinese
Government, which did not ratify
the treaty. The act of 1882
expired in 1892, and the Geary
law continuing the exclusion for
a further period of ten years
was passed May 5, 1892.
President Roosevelt recommended
in his message to Congress,
December, 1901, the continuance
of this policy, and the general
sentiment both in and out of
Congress still favors Chinese
exclusion and will demand
further legislation to this end.
The methods by which Chinese
exclusion has been accomplished
have not been above reproach,
but public opinion forced
radical action on the part of
the Government. It is asserted
by those who advocate Chinese
exclusion that the Chinese come
here not in families, but
chiefly as male laborers for a
temporary stay, to secure about
$1500 in savings and then return
to China with a competency. The
difference between the American
and Chinese civilization makes
it almost impossible to
assimilate them. They work for
low wages and live very cheaply.
Whether or not they would ever
come to this country in
sufficient numbers to constitute
a menace to the economic
interests of American labor,
which the American workingman
supposes, is doubtful.
The number of Chinese who came
to the United States from 1848
to 1852, when they began to come
as a result of the gold
discoveries, is estimated at
10,000. From 1852 to 1854 the
excess of arrivals over
departures amounted to 31,861.
During the next 15 years the
annual departures were about as
great as the annual arrivals;
1868 showed a net gain of 6876,
and from that year
down to 1876 the net gain was
about 11,000 per annum. The
census of 1880 showed 105,465,
exclusive of Hawaii; 1890;
107,488; 1900, 89,863. Consult:
Mayo-Smith, Emigration and
Immigration (New York, 1895).